Innovation is excitingโuntil the numbers get real.
New products. Bold tech. Market bets.
And in response, leaders often say: โWeโve allocated more capital to this. That should cover the risk.โ
๐๐ถ๐ต ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆโ๐ด ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐โ๐ท๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ด๐ถ๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ค๐ฉ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ช๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐บ: ๐๐ข๐ฑ๐ช๐ต๐ข๐ญ ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฏโ๐ต ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ช๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ช๐ด๐ฌ. ๐๐ต ๐ซ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ฃ๐ถ๐บ๐ด ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ช๐ด๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ ๐ช๐ต.
You can fund the product, the platform, the partner ecosystemโ
But if the thinking behind the innovation is flawed, more money only scales the failure.
Some of the most expensive missteps Iโve seen didnโt come from bad intentionsโ
They came from:
1,Building for imagined users, not actual ones
2.Launching with metrics, but no alignment on purpose
2.Assuming velocity = value
๐๐ฏ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ด๐ถ๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ, ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ช๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ, ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ข๐ค๐บ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ค๐ฆ๐ด๐ด๐ฆ๐ด, ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ค๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ต๐ณ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด๐ฆ๐ค๐ต.
๐๐ช๐ด๐ฌ ๐ช๐ด๐ฏโ๐ต ๐ซ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ต๐ฆ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฏ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ง๐ช๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ช๐ข๐ญ.๐๐ตโ๐ด ๐ค๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ข๐ญ. ๐๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ. ๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฏ.
Which means innovation doesnโt just need capital. It needs:
1. Grounded decision-making
2. Clarity of problem before speed of build
3. People whoโll name the blind spots, not just deliver the roadmap
Innovation without reflection isnโt bold. Itโs reckless. And capital without clarity isnโt a cushionโitโs just cost deferred.